The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Monday asked the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court decision granting House Democrats access to redacted grand jury materials from former special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerCNN’s Toobin warns McCabe is in ‘perilous condition’ with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill’s 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s Russia probe.
The Monday filing serves as the Trump administration’s formal appeal of a March order to hand over secret transcripts and exhibits that Democratic leaders of the House Judiciary Committee initially sought as part of the impeachment inquiry into President TrumpDonald John TrumpFauci says his meetings with Trump have ‘dramatically decreased’ McEnany criticizes DC mayor for not imposing earlier curfew amid protests Stopping Israel’s annexation is a US national security interest MORE.
The justices previously granted the administration’s request to halt the disclosure order, issued by a divided three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, from taking effect to allow time for an appeal.
In its filing, DOJ lawyers urged the justices to take up the case and to prevent an unwarranted breach of grand jury secrecy.
“In light of the national prominence of this grand-jury investigation, the separation-of-powers concerns raised by the decision below, and the potential damage that decision could inflict on ‘the proper functioning of our grand jury system,’ this Court’s review is warranted,” they wrote.
Democrats have long argued the additional information would provide a more complete picture of Mueller’s findings related to Trump’s alleged obstruction of the former special counsel as well as his 2016 campaign’s interactions with Russian government officials.
At the conclusion of his nearly two-year probe in March 2019, Mueller did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally coordinated with Moscow. He declined to say if the president obstructed justice, but Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrIt wasn’t just religious liberty that Chief Justice Roberts strangled The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Trump tweets as tensions escalate across US Trump says he will designate antifa a terrorist organization MORE and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod RosensteinRod RosensteinThis week: Senate reconvenes as protests roil nation amid pandemic Schumer to GOP: Cancel ‘conspiracy hearings’ on origins of Russia probe GOP chairman to seek subpoena power in investigation of Russia probe, ‘unmasking’ requests MORE concluded he had not.
In March, a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit ruled 2-1 that the House’s impeachment inquiry was a justified basis to request the sealed documents.