If you believe Bernie Sanders has some fully radical socialist views now, you really should have noticed him when he was a more youthful gentleman coming up in Vermont politics. All through an job interview with Jake Tapper this weekend, Sanders was reminded of a single of his seriously “out there” procedures from again in the day. Tapper questioned him about his proposal to have a highest wage in the United States on prime of the least wage we currently have in area. Sanders was plainly not thrilled with currently being reminded of this and attempted to dismiss the question out of hand. (Totally free Beacon)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) on Sunday refused to talk about his help for a “maximum wage” through his early days in Vermont politics, contacting the unearthing of these kinds of radical proposals not “productive.”
“Early in your political job, way back in 1974, you claimed that it should really be unlawful to receive extra cash than another person could invest in his or her lifetime,” CNN’s Condition of the Union anchor Jake Tapper said. “You proposed a optimum wage cap on the optimum earners.”
Sanders dismissed the question as irrelevant to his present-day political views.
Let us go to the online video so everyone can take pleasure in this rather awkward, awkward minute. (via Twitter)
Bernie Sanders fires back immediately after Jake Tapper asks him about his backing of a wage cap in 1974 that CNN lately dug up.
“Did you go back again to my 3rd-grade essay when I was in PS 197 about what I said?” pic.twitter.com/FYpjudY3Yu
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) February 9, 2020
You have to question if the grind of the marketing campaign path is setting up to get to Bernie at this stage. Responding to the concern by asking if Tapper experienced long gone back again to his third-quality essay from elementary college was a bit of scolding that arrived off as a obstacle to the media, suggesting that anything at all from his political previous was someway off-limitations. But that didn’t transpire when Sanders was a kid. As Tapper pointed out to him, Sanders said that when he was a fully developed grownup in his thirties. If his posture has transformed right after more thing to consider, he could simply just say so and clarify why.
But Sanders didn’t do that. Not only didn’t he deny that he’d held that view, but he also didn’t even say that he had deserted it. Why? I’m heading to toss out a guess below (because Bernie did not offer you to make clear) and counsel that he even now thinks that currently. The only cause he’s not saying it is that he realizes how unpopular it would be.
This is yet one more place exactly where Sanders and other socialists make incorrect assumptions about the bitterness of center and reduced-income staff. They believe that the public’s intended hatred of the dreaded “top a single percent” extends to the level exactly where every person wishes to tear them down. That could be real for some, but surely not a majority. (And not for nothing, but it is an intriguing argument to have with a guy who owns three homes.)
The fact is that most people today really don’t want to punish the wealthy, mostly mainly because virtually everybody nevertheless harbors hopes of getting wealthy. This principle brings to intellect a tale that Joe Scarborough routinely tells when he does interviews or gives speeches. His father would drive past some big, highly-priced property, considerably nicer than the 1 they lived in. He would clarify to his youngsters that he didn’t resent the folks residing in such mansions. He just required the option to have a household like that himself one particular day.
And that’s the fundamental distinction amongst capitalists and socialists in a nutshell. It is equality of chance versus equality of final result. This interview is a superior reminder of what Senator Sanders and quite a few of his competitors for the nomination assume about that issue.